Effective Strategies for Managing Chronic Subdural Hematoma

Overview of Chronic Subdural Hematoma and Treatment Options

Chronic subdural hematoma (cSDH) is a common neurosurgical condition that predominantly affects the elderly population, particularly those with a history of head trauma, anticoagulant use, or coagulopathy. This condition is characterized by the accumulation of blood between the dura mater and the brain’s surface, leading to increased intracranial pressure and neurological deficits. Symptoms often include headache, confusion, gait disturbances, and in severe cases, loss of consciousness (Weber et al., 2025).

The management of cSDH typically involves surgical intervention, with burr hole evacuation being the most common approach. This procedure aims to relieve pressure on the brain and remove the accumulated hematoma. Treatment options also include conservative management in asymptomatic patients or those with minimal symptoms, though surgical intervention is generally preferred due to the risk of deterioration (Weber et al., 2025).

In cases of significant cSDH, surgical evacuation is crucial. The choice between local anesthesia (LA) and general anesthesia (GA) for this procedure has been a topic of considerable debate. While GA has traditionally been the standard, recent studies suggest that LA may provide comparable safety and efficacy, particularly in older patients who are at higher risk for complications associated with GA (Weber et al., 2025).

Comparison of Local Anesthesia and General Anesthesia for cSDH

The choice of anesthesia in cSDH surgical procedures can significantly impact patient outcomes. A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing LA and GA for burr hole evacuation of cSDH revealed several key differences in postoperative outcomes.

Advantages of Local Anesthesia

1. Reduced Complications: Studies indicate that LA is associated with a lower incidence of complications compared to GA. Patients undergoing surgery under LA experienced fewer postoperative issues such as delirium and prolonged recovery times, making it a safer option for the elderly (Weber et al., 2025).

2. Shorter Surgical Duration: Operations performed under LA are typically quicker. This is attributed to the avoidance of intubation and the complexities associated with GA (Weber et al., 2025).

3. Shorter Hospital Stay: Patients who undergo cSDH evacuation under LA often have shorter hospital stays, further reducing healthcare costs and resource utilization (Weber et al., 2025).

Disadvantages of Local Anesthesia

1. Patient Anxiety: Some patients may experience anxiety or discomfort during the procedure while awake, which could potentially affect their overall experience and outcomes.

2. Limited Surgical Field: In cases of extensive cSDH or complex anatomical considerations, LA may limit the surgeon’s ability to maneuver effectively.

Advantages of General Anesthesia

1. Complete Patient Control: GA allows for complete control of the patient’s airway and comfort, which can be particularly important in anxious patients or those with complex medical histories.

2. Better Visualization: GA may facilitate better surgical visualization in challenging cases, allowing the surgeon to operate without patient movement.

Disadvantages of General Anesthesia

1. Higher Risk of Complications: GA is associated with risks such as respiratory issues and delayed recovery, especially in older patients with comorbidities (Weber et al., 2025).

2. Longer Recovery Time: Patients may require longer monitoring post-surgery due to the effects of anesthesia, resulting in extended hospital stays.

Surgical Techniques for Burr Hole Evacuation of cSDH

The surgical technique for burr hole evacuation of cSDH is crucial for successful outcomes. The procedure involves trepanation of the skull to create a burr hole, allowing access to the hematoma for evacuation. Key steps include:

1. Preoperative Imaging: Detailed imaging studies, such as CT or MRI, are essential to define the hematoma’s size, location, and any associated brain atrophy.

2. Patient Positioning: The patient is positioned appropriately, usually in a supine position, with the head elevated to facilitate drainage.

3. Anesthesia Administration: Depending on the chosen method, either LA or GA is administered.

4. Burr Hole Creation: A small incision is made, and a burr hole is drilled through the skull. Care is taken to avoid damaging underlying structures.

5. Hematoma Evacuation: The hematoma is evacuated, often using irrigation to clear residual blood and debris. In some cases, a subdural drain may be placed to facilitate further drainage.

6. Closure: The burr hole is covered, and the incision is closed in layers.

The effectiveness of these techniques is enhanced by the surgeon’s experience and the use of appropriate imaging technology to guide the procedure (Weber et al., 2025).

Postoperative Outcomes and Complication Rates in cSDH Surgery

Postoperative outcomes following burr hole evacuation for cSDH can vary significantly based on several factors including anesthesia type, surgical technique, and patient comorbidities. Studies indicate that the overall complication rate for cSDH surgery ranges between 10% to 30%, with a variety of complications:

1. Recurrence of Hematoma: The recurrence rates for cSDH can reach up to 20% in some studies, necessitating further intervention.

2. Infection: Surgical site infections are a risk, particularly in patients with compromised immune systems.

3. Neurological Deficits: Depending on the extent of the hematoma and the duration of symptoms before surgery, some patients may experience persistent neurological deficits postoperatively.

4. Delirium: The incidence of postoperative delirium is notably higher in patients undergoing surgery under GA, particularly in elderly populations (Weber et al., 2025).

A detailed analysis of postoperative outcomes has shown that patients undergoing surgery under LA have a lower incidence of these complications compared to those undergoing GA. The systematic review and meta-analysis conducted by Weber et al. (2025) highlighted that LA is associated with a statistically significant reduction in overall complications and a more favorable recovery profile.

Recommendations for Best Practices in cSDH Management

Based on current evidence, the following best practices are recommended for managing chronic subdural hematoma:

1. Early Surgical Intervention: Patients presenting with symptomatic cSDH should be evaluated for surgical intervention promptly to prevent deterioration.

2. Choice of Anesthesia: Consideration of LA for eligible patients, particularly the elderly, can reduce the risk of postoperative complications and shorten recovery time.

3. Multidisciplinary Approach: Involving a multidisciplinary team, including neurosurgeons, anesthesiologists, and geriatric specialists, can optimize patient outcomes by addressing the complexities associated with cSDH.

4. Postoperative Monitoring: Close monitoring in a recovery setting is essential, particularly for patients undergoing GA, to identify and manage any complications early.

5. Follow-up Imaging: Regular follow-up imaging should be conducted to monitor for potential recurrence of hematoma.

6. Patient Education: Educating patients and families about the signs of complications and the importance of follow-up care can enhance outcomes.

FAQ

What is chronic subdural hematoma? Chronic subdural hematoma is the accumulation of blood between the dura mater and the brain’s surface, often caused by head traumSymptoms may include headaches, confusion, and neurological deficits.

What are the treatment options for cSDH? Treatment typically involves surgical evacuation, most commonly performed via burr hole surgery. In some cases, conservative management may be appropriate for asymptomatic patients.

What anesthesia options are available for cSDH surgery? Surgery can be performed under local anesthesia (LA) or general anesthesia (GA). Recent studies suggest that LA may be associated with fewer complications.

What are the risks associated with cSDH surgery? Risks include recurrence of hematoma, infection, neurological deficits, and delirium. The type of anesthesia used may influence these outcomes.

How can I prevent chronic subdural hematoma? Preventive measures include managing risk factors such as anticoagulant use, ensuring fall prevention in elderly populations, and seeking prompt treatment for head injuries.

References

1. Weber, C. F., Ferdowssian, K., Hecht, N., & Vajkoczy, P. (2025). Burr hole evacuation of chronic subdural hematoma in general versus local anesthesia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Neurochirurgica, 167(1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-025-06475-x
2. Cai, J., Hong, Z., & Zheng, L. (2025). Effect of methylprednisolone vs hydrocortisone on 30-day mortality in critically ill adults with septic shock: an analysis of the MIMIC-IV database. BMC Infectious Diseases. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-025-10731-x
3. Inaba, S., Okumura, H., Nakanishi, Y., & Kawashima, A. (2024). Brown nails as clues for shock diagnosis. Journal of General and Family Medicine, 26(4), 169-170
4. Yi, X. M., Cai, H. Q., & Jiao, Y. (2025). Programmed cell death receptor 1 inhibitor Pembrolizumab in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer. World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 17(2), 100257. https://doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v17.i2.100257
5. Bamat, N. A., Nelin, T. D., & Lorch, S. (2024). Association of furosemide versus chlorothiazide exposures with serum sodium, potassium, and chloride among infants with bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Journal of Perinatology. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41372-024-02159-z
6. Crespi, B. J., & Dinsdale, N. L. (2024). Testosterone mediates life‐history trade‐offs in female mammals. Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 100(4), 1002292