Impact of Cow Dung and Soil on Pathogens in Rural Homes

Introduction to Household Pathogens and Antimicrobial Resistance

Household pathogens pose significant risks, particularly in rural environments where sanitation may be lacking. The prevalence of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a growing concern, as it exacerbates the threat posed by these pathogens. In low- and middle-income countries, inadequate housing materials and cohabitation with domestic animals can lead to fecal contamination of households. This contamination not only facilitates the transmission of enteric pathogens but also contributes to the emergence of AMR, particularly in settings with close human-animal interactions (Nguyen et al., 2025).

Research indicates that children are especially susceptible to infections due to their propensity to ingest soil, which may contain harmful microorganisms (Nguyen et al., 2025). Hence, understanding the dynamics of pathogens in rural homes, particularly the contribution of cow dung as a common household material, is crucial for public health interventions aimed at reducing disease incidence and controlling AMR.

Significance of Cow Dung in Rural Household Environments

In many rural households, especially in countries like Bangladesh, cow dung is not merely waste but is often used in various capacities, including as a sealant for soil floors, a fertilizer, and a cooking fuel. This practice raises concerns about the microbial load that may accompany the use of cow dung in domestic settings (Nguyen et al., 2025). Cow dung can harbor numerous pathogens and antimicrobial resistance genes, which can then be transmitted to humans through various routes, including direct contact and environmental exposure.

In a study conducted in rural Bangladesh, it was observed that homes with soil floors and domestic animals showed higher levels of potential pathogens and ARGs. The study detected 182 pathogen species in both soil and cow dung, highlighting the significance of cow dung as a potential reservoir of pathogens (Nguyen et al., 2025).

Microbial Diversity in Soil Floors vs. Cow Dung

The microbial composition of cow dung and soil floors can differ significantly, reflecting the environmental conditions and anthropogenic influences present in these habitats. In the aforementioned study, soil samples showed a mean relative abundance of potential pathogens such as E. coli and Pseudomonas, while cow dung samples contained pathogens like Salmonella and Clostridium (Nguyen et al., 2025).

Table 1: Potential Pathogens Detected in Soil and Cow Dung Samples

The results indicate that while both environments are rich in microbial diversity, cow dung presents a higher diversity of potential pathogens compared to soil floors. This diverse microbial community can influence the health of individuals residing in these households, especially young children who are at greater risk of microbial exposure.

Antimicrobial Resistance Genes Detected in Household Samples

The study also provided insights into the presence of antimicrobial resistance genes (ARGs) within cow dung and soil samples. All samples contained ARGs conferring resistance to critical antibiotic classes, including sulfonamides, rifamycin, and tetracycline. The presence of these ARGs poses a significant public health risk, as they can lead to treatment failures and increased morbidity and mortality from infections.

Table 2: Antimicrobial Resistance Genes Detected in Samples

The findings indicate that household environments, particularly those involving cow dung, represent significant reservoirs for both pathogens and ARGs. The lack of shared ARGs between cow dung and soil indicates that although they coexist in the same environment, they may not directly influence each other’s resistomes.

Implications for Public Health and Future Research Directions

The implications of these findings are profound. They suggest the need for public health interventions that focus on improving housing conditions and sanitation practices in rural settings. Education about the risks associated with using cow dung in households, particularly regarding hygiene practices, could help mitigate the transmission of pathogens and reduce the burden of antimicrobial resistance.

Future research should aim to explore the mechanisms of pathogen transmission from cow dung to humans more rigorously. Longitudinal studies could help in understanding the dynamics of microbial populations in households over time and assess the effectiveness of interventions designed to improve household hygiene and reduce pathogen load.

FAQ

Why is cow dung considered a potential reservoir for pathogens?
Cow dung can harbor a variety of microorganisms, including pathogens that can infect humans. The close cohabitation of humans and animals increases the risk of exposure to these pathogens.

How does the use of cow dung contribute to antimicrobial resistance?
Cow dung often contains antimicrobial resistance genes that can be transmitted to humans, particularly in settings where there is poor sanitation and close contact with animal waste.

What are the public health implications of this study?
The study highlights the need for improved sanitation and housing conditions in rural areas to reduce the risk of infections and antimicrobial resistance associated with cow dung usage.

What future research is needed?
Further research is needed to investigate the transmission dynamics of pathogens from cow dung to humans and to evaluate the impact of interventions aimed at improving household hygiene.

References

1. Nguyen, A. T., Ratnasiri, K., Barratt Heitmann, G., Tazin, S., Anderson, C., Hanif, S., Yeamin, A., Shoab, A. K., Shanta, I. S., Jahan, F., Hossain, M. S., Mahmud, Z. H., & Benjamin-Chung, J. (2025). Potential pathogens and antimicrobial resistance genes in household environments: a study of soil floors and cow dung in rural Bangladesh. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 83

2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2022). Underlying cause of death 2018–2022, single race

3. Hwang, S. W., & Burns, T. (2014). Health interventions for people who are homeless. The Lancet, 384(9953), 1541–1547 14)61133-8

4. United States Department of Housing and Urban Development. (2022). Housing Choice Voucher Program

5. Wical, W., Baker, N. S., Strong, B., Lovelady, N., & Richardson, J. B. (2025). Violent firearm injury and homelessness: Examining the experiences of Black men participating in hospital-based violence intervention programs. American Journal of Men’s Health, 19(3)

6. Chatterjee, D., & Ghosh, P. (2025). Bayesian hierarchical modeling of mucosal immune responses and growth efficiency in young animals: Demonstrating the superiority of data-dependent empirical priors. PLoS One, 20(4). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0326273

7. Obstetric violence: perspectives from mothers, midwives, and obstetricians. (2025). Frontiers in Global Women’s Health, 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgwh.2025.1609632

8. Cognitive computational model reveals repetition bias in a sequential decision-making task. (2025). Nature Reviews Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44271-025-00271-0