The Impact of Workplace Culture on Gender Equity in STEMM

The Impact of Workplace Culture on Gender Equity in STEMM

In the contemporary landscape of Science, Technology, Engineering, Mathematics, and Medicine (STEMM), gender equity remains a persistent challenge. The workplace culture within academic institutions profoundly influences the experiences of women and marginalized groups. Historically, STEMM fields have been male-dominated, resulting in systemic barriers that hinder the advancement of women, particularly women of color. Gender bias manifests in various forms, including unequal hiring practices, lack of mentorship, and exclusionary classroom environments, which collectively contribute to a “leaky pipeline” phenomenon, where women exit the academic system before reaching leadership positions (Lerchenmueller & Sorenson, 2018; Yildirim & Eslen-Ziya, 2021).

For example, research has shown that women in STEMM face higher rates of discrimination and microaggressions, which can lead to lower self-esteem and reduced participation in professional development opportunities (White & Morton, 2024). Supportive workplace cultures, characterized by open discussions about gender inequity and institutional policies aimed at fostering inclusivity, are critical to improving gender equity outcomes. In contrast, unsupportive environments perpetuate the status quo, making it more challenging for women to navigate their academic careers (Bhadra et al., 2025).

Creating a culture that prioritizes equity requires a multifaceted approach, involving changes at both the individual and institutional levels. Institutions must implement clear policies, such as gender equity training programs and inclusive hiring practices, to ensure that women are represented in leadership roles. Furthermore, fostering an environment that encourages discussions around gender bias and promotes peer support can empower women to advocate for their needs and aspirations in STEMM fields (Sreetama Bhadra et al., 2025).

Barriers Faced by Black Male Students in STEMM Fields

Black male students in STEMM encounter unique challenges that significantly impede their academic progress. Research highlights the systemic barriers that disproportionately affect this demographic, including racial microaggressions, exclusionary classroom practices, and the “weed-out” culture prevalent in many STEMM programs (McGee, 2020; Bottia et al., 2021). For instance, Black students often report feeling undervalued and unsupported in predominantly white academic environments, which can lead to increased anxiety and decreased confidence in their abilities.

One poignant example is the experience of Travis, a Black male student who reflected on his journey through an undergraduate biology program. He recounted how microaggressions from faculty and peers shaped his perception of belonging within the STEMM community. These experiences not only affected his self-esteem but also his persistence in pursuing a career in science (Ayers et al., 2025). The combination of high-stakes competitive environments and a lack of representation further exacerbates the challenges faced by Black male students, creating an academic landscape that often feels unwelcoming and hostile.

To address these barriers, institutions must implement targeted interventions that support Black male students in STEMM. This includes mentorship programs that connect students with role models who share similar backgrounds, creating inclusive curricula that reflect diverse contributions to science, and fostering environments where students can openly discuss their experiences without fear of retribution (Fries-Britt & White-Lewis, 2020; White & Morton, 2024).

Strategies for Fostering Supportive Environments in Academia

Fostering supportive environments in STEMM academia involves implementing strategies that directly address the barriers faced by underrepresented groups. Institutions must prioritize creating inclusive spaces that actively promote diversity and equity. One effective approach is the establishment of mentorship programs that connect students with faculty and professionals who can provide guidance and support in navigating the academic landscape.

Another crucial strategy is the incorporation of equity training for faculty and staff to raise awareness of biases and systemic inequities present in academic settings (Lesnefsky et al., 2024). Such training can empower educators to recognize their own biases and take actionable steps to create more equitable classroom environments. Initiatives that promote collaborative learning and peer support can also enhance students’ sense of belonging and encourage them to engage more fully in their academic pursuits.

Research has shown that course-based undergraduate research experiences (CUREs) can significantly enhance student engagement and learning outcomes, particularly for marginalized groups (Brownell & Kloser, 2015; Corwin et al., 2015). By providing students with hands-on research opportunities, institutions can help bridge the gap between classroom learning and real-world applications, fostering a deeper understanding of scientific practices and enhancing students’ confidence in their abilities.

The Role of Mentorship in Promoting Inclusion and Success

Mentorship plays a pivotal role in promoting inclusion and success for underrepresented students in STEMM fields. Effective mentorship can provide guidance, encouragement, and resources that help students navigate the complexities of academic life. Research indicates that students who participate in mentoring relationships are more likely to persist in their studies and achieve their academic goals (Burt et al., 2020).

Mentors can offer valuable insights into the academic and professional pathways available to students, helping them to set realistic goals and develop the skills necessary for success. Additionally, mentoring relationships can help build a sense of community among students, fostering connections that enhance their overall educational experience. Programs that match students with mentors who share similar backgrounds or experiences can be particularly effective in addressing the unique challenges faced by underrepresented groups (Dodo Seriki & McDonald, 2022).

To maximize the impact of mentorship, institutions should prioritize training for mentors to ensure they are equipped to support their mentees effectively. This includes providing resources and guidance on best practices for mentoring, as well as creating opportunities for mentors and mentees to engage in meaningful interactions. By fostering strong mentoring relationships, institutions can help create a culture of support and inclusivity that enhances student success in STEMM fields (Kirk et al., 2023).

Recommendations for Policymakers to Improve Gender Equity

Policymakers play a crucial role in advancing gender equity in STEMM education environments. To create lasting change, it is essential to implement policies that promote inclusivity and support for underrepresented groups. Key recommendations for policymakers include:

1. Incentivize Equity Training: Provide funding and resources for institutions to implement comprehensive equity training programs for faculty and staff to raise awareness of biases and systemic inequities.

2. Support Mentorship Programs: Encourage the establishment of mentorship programs that connect underrepresented students with mentors who can provide guidance and support throughout their academic journeys.

3. Promote Inclusive Hiring Practices: Implement policies that require institutions to adopt inclusive hiring practices that prioritize diversity in faculty and administrative positions.

4. Foster Community Engagement: Encourage partnerships between academic institutions and local communities to create pathways for underrepresented students to access STEMM education and career opportunities.

5. Evaluate and Monitor Progress: Establish mechanisms for evaluating and monitoring the effectiveness of equity initiatives and programs, ensuring accountability and transparency in efforts to improve gender equity in STEMM.

By implementing these recommendations, policymakers can help create a more equitable and inclusive STEMM education landscape that empowers all students to succeed.

Conclusion

Enhancing gender equity in STEMM education environments requires a multifaceted approach that addresses systemic barriers and fosters supportive cultures. By prioritizing mentorship, promoting inclusive practices, and implementing effective policies, institutions can create environments where all students, regardless of gender or background, can thrive. As we move forward, it is essential to continue advocating for equity and inclusion in STEMM education, recognizing the value of diverse perspectives in shaping the future of science and technology.

FAQ

What are the main barriers to gender equity in STEMM education? Major barriers include systemic biases, lack of mentorship, exclusionary practices, and a competitive environment that disproportionately affects women and underrepresented minorities.

How important is mentorship in STEMM? Mentorship is crucial for supporting students, providing guidance, and fostering a sense of community, which can significantly enhance student success in STEMM fields.

What role do policymakers play in improving gender equity in STEMM? Policymakers can implement policies that promote inclusivity, support mentorship programs, incentivize equity training, and establish mechanisms for monitoring progress toward gender equity goals.

How can institutions create more supportive environments for underrepresented students? Institutions can create supportive environments by implementing equity training, fostering mentorship relationships, providing hands-on research opportunities, and promoting collaborative learning experiences.

What strategies can students employ to navigate challenges in STEMM? Students can seek out mentorship, engage in peer support networks, participate in research opportunities, and advocate for themselves within their academic environments.

References

1. Bhadra, S., Damasceno, G., Hoss, D., & Weyrich, A. (2025). Improving gender equity in academia depends on the workplace environment. eLife, 10, e105352

2. Bottia, M. C., et al. (2021). The impact of weed-out courses on Black students in STEM. Journal of STEM Education, 22(4), 56-68.

3. Brownell, S. E., & Kloser, M. J. (2015). Course-based undergraduate research experiences: Impacts and opportunities. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 14(1), es1. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.14-10-0163

4. Burt, B. A., et al. (2020). The role of mentorship in STEM fields: A systematic review. International Journal of STEM Education, 7(1), 1-15.

5. Dodo Seriki, M., & McDonald, C. (2022). Culturally competent advising in STEM. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 21(2), ar12

6. Fries-Britt, S., & White-Lewis, D. (2020). The experiences of Black male students in STEM: A holistic perspective. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 57(9), 1341-1370.

7. Kirk, E. A., et al. (2023). Understanding the role of STEM education in promoting equity and inclusion. International Journal of Science Education, 45(6), 789-810.

8. Lee, C. S., et al. (2020). Racial microaggressions and their impact on Black male students. Journal of Black Psychology, 46(4), 299-318.

9. Lesnefsky, R. R., et al. (2024). Exploring resources and reasoning practices in socioscientific system modeling for justice-centered science education. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 24(1), ar17. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.24-01-0017

10. McGee, R. (2020). The complexities of Black male students in STEM: A critical analysis. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 15(3), 657-678.

11. Weston, T. J., et al. (2019). The impact of competitive environments on STEMM students. Journal of STEM Education, 20(3), 42-58.

12. White, M., & Morton, T. (2024). Racialized experiences of Black male scientists in STEM. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 61(1), 99-118.